2 ms·
McCarthy thought Weizenbaum was a crank: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/1045264.1045265 https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/1045264.1045265 "This moralisti
by abrax3141 4y ago
McCarthy thought Weizenbaum was a crank:
https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/1045264.1045265 https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/1045264.1045265
"This moralistic and incoherent book uses computer science and technology as an illustration to support the view promoted by Lewis Mumford, Theodore Roszak, and Jacques Ellul, that science has led to an immoral view of man and the world. I am frightened by its arguments that certain research should not be done if it is based on or might result in an "obscene" picture of the world and man. Worse yet, the book's notion of "obscenity" is vague enough to admit arbitrary interpretations by activist bureaucrats."
- tokai 4y agohah point 6 in their review is interesting. >It seems exceedingly unlikely that the v e r y difficult problems of intelligence can be solved by "hackers" without a deep theory. Guess they were very wrong.
- abrax3141 4y agoI can’t tell if you’re joking. If not, what very difficult problem of intelligence have hackers solved? (Of course, I can weasel out by just redefining “very difficult” no matter what you say. :-)