One thing I omitted that I thought wasn’t particularly relevant to your analysis of the merger agreement and my criticisms thereof, was the way you elided EM’s

One thing I omitted that I thought wasn’t particularly relevant to your analysis of the merger agreement and my criticisms thereof, was the way you elided EM’s initial accumulation of shares, the multiple violations of securities laws he quite probably committed in connection with those purchases, the several hundred million dollars he ripped off from other shareholders through those violations of securities laws, and his (belated) realization that by joining the Twitter board, he would have owed a fiduciary duties to the other shareholder (and not just his own interests). So that part of your post was at best overly credulous and in any event dismissive of bad faith right from the outset. The rest of my post speaks for itself in response to most of your assertions.