4 ms·
No, it puts the minimum number of representatives at about 6000, one per 50,000 people, where right now there are 435, one per about 650,000. That would be a s
by JasonFruit 4y ago
No, it puts the minimum number of representatives at about 6000, one per 50,000 people, where right now there are 435, one per about 650,000. That would be a significant change, in my eyes.
- josephcsible 4y agoNo, it puts the maximum number at about 6000.
- JasonFruit 4y agoI see that now. Interesting. Well, I'm wrong on that text — but I still think the idea, as I had previously understood it, is a good one, and we have the technology to make a 6000-person House of Representatives workable.