2 ms·
It refutes your point that digital evidence is enough. It's clearly not. So the original point was correct.
by yucky 4y ago
It refutes your point that digital evidence is enough. It's clearly not. So the original point was correct.
- giantg2 4y agoWhere did I say that? I remember saying in the digital age those connections are easier to make. Once they know the individual, they have vast digital resources to make the connections. Digital evidence can lead to physical or bystander evidence. I don't see any refutation. Even if my point was somehow invalid, that doesn't make your point correct. That would be a fallacy.