3 ms·
The laws being broken were clearly unjust and Uber committed civil disobedience (in the American tradition) by breaking them. That doesn't mean every underhande
by dnissley 4y ago
The laws being broken were clearly unjust and Uber committed civil disobedience (in the American tradition) by breaking them. That doesn't mean every underhanded thing Uber has ever done has been justified, but in this particular instance it seems like it was. No one wants to be sympathetic to a large corporation of course, but that's a conversation most people aren't willing to have...
- pyrale 4y ago> The laws being broken were clearly unjust We're talking about laws from foreign countries too here, some of which were clearly aimed at preventing civil servants from becoming corrupt. > Uber committed civil disobedience (in the American tradition) Comitting "civil disobedience" against a foreign country to force them to open to business? Sure, it may be a tradition if you refer to Matthew Perry or William Walker.