3 ms·

Steam's TOS pretty clearly states that everything you "purchase" is basically just a licensed subscription to that content. [0] ...the rights to access and/or

Steam's TOS pretty clearly states that everything you "purchase" is basically just a licensed subscription to that content. [0] ...the rights to access and/or use any Content and Services accessible through Steam are referred to in this Agreement as "Subscriptions." ... The Content and Services are licensed, not sold. Your license confers no title or ownership in the Content and Services. [0] https://store.steampowered.com/subscriber_agreement https://store.steampowered.com/subscriber_agreement

altairprime 4y ago
Those terms could be invalidated by a court of law, if a court case were to reach a judge.
- izacus 4y ago
  Last I checked IP law courts have upheld this interpretation in case of Apple so don't be so sure.
- 3np 4y ago
  In some places it is. See comments elsewhere.
Double_a_92 4y ago
Even if I bought a subscription, why are they allowed to just cancel it?
jonathanstrange 4y ago
This is not what GP asked. AFAIK, it's not legal in the EU as long as the customer has a reasonable expectation that the subscription is not time-limited, i.e., if no time limitation is clearly mentioned when the subscription is purchased. There are often clauses in EULAs stating things like "our company has the right to terminate the subscription at any time for no reason" but these are generally void and can make the whole EULA void. Otherwise, it would be legal to sell software and simply switch it off after 6 months - or, after one month, or even after one day. Clearly, that would be fraud. The question is rather which of the EU customers will/can afford to sue Steam. My guess is they'll offer a refund for those games before it comes to a law suit.