Ok, so it's a position opposed to active measures? I can certainly see the argument, there could very well be negative unintended consequences. Ultimately I sup

Ok, so it's a position opposed to active measures? I can certainly see the argument, there could very well be negative unintended consequences. Ultimately I suppose it's a matter of balancing the risks. If controlling emissions proves unrealistic, or if a feedback effect kicks in like melting oceanic methane or tundra melting, then active measures may be the only option left.