3 ms·
I think you need to consider visiting outside of the echo chamber you live in. We do not have some epidemic of innocent people being shot. You feed on turning
by kepler1 4y ago
I think you need to consider visiting outside of the echo chamber you live in. We do not have some epidemic of innocent people being shot. You feed on turning 0.001% exceptions into the rule.
- ClumsyPilot 4y agoyou need to reexamine your values. To even suggest that Noise pollution suffered by police is more important than even 1 person. getting shot is incredible. To suggest that when 2500 people are shot annyally is simply breathtaking. UK police kills 0 - 2 people a year, you have more people in prison than Russia and China combined, and you think you *Don't* have a problem?
- kepler1 4y agoI'm not solving for loud noises that the police have to hear. You took my literal words, lost the point, and turned it into ready outrage. There are legitimate reasons for the police to have bystanders stay a distance away from them while doing their job. Not having people purposely stand in the police's way and provoke conflict while filming is reasonable. And let's not go down the hole of analyzing police shooting stats. We can do that endlessly. How many of those shootings were against armed suspects? How many were in the process of committing crimes? We can go on and on. Your numbers will drop fast. Not saying we don't have a problem with guns in this country. But putting the outrage on having to stand reasonably far away from a police officer isn't where it's going to be solved.