The author has no training in economics, government, or science, and he has been criticized by the actual scientific community for promoting his own misundersta

The author has no training in economics, government, or science, and he has been criticized by the actual scientific community for promoting his own misunderstanding of science (which isn't quite climate-change denialism, but is definitely not based in reality either). My point is that he has a strong bias about this and also doesn't seem qualified to offer an analysis on this situation in a country he hasn't followed or studied until this crisis.