Let me TL;DR it: Spends ages telling us a revisionist history we mostly know. Then says it deserves this because the chairperson of Mozilla has a ridiculous sal

Let me TL;DR it: Spends ages telling us a revisionist history we mostly know. Then says it deserves this because the chairperson of Mozilla has a ridiculous salary (agreed). That's nonsense though. Firefox did a lot of stupid things (FF OS etc.) and took too long to deliver things like quantum, security, etc. But they got there eventually and they're still a non-profit. So while I don't support the salary of the chairperson, I do support it. It's also a better product than Chrome at this point in time (for my usage). Still has ways to go. It seems that OP is just looking for attention by being an a-hole. Pretty lame behavior IMHO.