34 ms·
>So the law defining it as 8’ just gave everyone 17’ feet of freedom. A law, but not this law, which explicitly does not grant any right.
by thfuran 4y ago
>So the law defining it as 8’ just gave everyone 17’ feet of freedom.
A law, but not this law, which explicitly does not grant any right.
- chrisseaton 4y agoBut the interpretation of the law likely will - as soon as a judge rules you were 9 feet away and so ok, that establishes a precedent, based on this law.
- thfuran 4y agoWhy would a judge ignore the clause that explicitly states that it doesn't grant any right or authorize any person to record? At nine feet away, this law has no bearing and the earlier precedent should still apply.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]