> We probably shouldn't turn this into a Roe v Wade thread Yes, you're probably right. It's not likely to be productive. > ... but perhaps they were talking a

> We probably shouldn't turn this into a Roe v Wade thread Yes, you're probably right. It's not likely to be productive. > ... but perhaps they were talking about the state legislation released by the court, which is applied equally to the people who want or don't want it and is not a result of a popular vote. Perhaps, but it doesn't read that way. Even if it were, that would just be lamenting representative democracy. Maybe a better point than the one that actually seems to have been made, but also probably not a particularly productive conversation.