4 ms·
Same. I love lichess and I’m so happy it exists, but I prefer the chess.com interface for playing, and analyzing games. Probably because I started there
by sib301 4y ago
Same. I love lichess and I’m so happy it exists, but I prefer the chess.com interface for playing, and analyzing games.
Probably because I started there
- sgjohnson 4y agoI play on both sites, but for analysis I almost always import the games into chess.com
- trungdq88 4y agoCan you share what it is that you need to see on chess.com but is not available on lichess? (I use lichess analysis frequently and haven't used chess.com much)
- bionsystem 4y agoI personally think lichess analysis is better : - latest engine, with webassembly or cloud mode - "learn from your mistakes" mode where when there is a drop in valuation of the position, you're given the position and are asked to find a better move ; you can also find bad moves from the opponent which is interesting to help spot mistakes faster Also puzzles are great if you have an account (free), I find the puzzles of great quality, they really match your level and once you get better at solving the common tactics, they look more and more like small studies where you might only get positionnal advantage sometimes (instead of the classic "win material / mate in X moves" type of problem which is a bit redundant after a while). I don't know how they generate puzzles but it seems that a lot of them are from games actually played on the site where only one line seems to give an advantage. I think it's amazing that they do that. High quality puzzles from real games.