4 ms·
What is the point of this? That new companies should be even smarter than the stablished ones and therefore try to game the system even more? Or that we should
by melenaboija 4y ago
What is the point of this? That new companies should be even smarter than the stablished ones and therefore try to game the system even more? Or that we should learn from them and try to improve the situation and make all of them follow the rules?
- ArrayBoundCheck 4y agoHis point was going after newer and smaller companies is a joke when larger companies are basically getting away with murder, or more accurately doing nearly the same thing you're punishing smaller companies for doing (at a larger scale)
- melenaboija 4y agoI still don’t understand the reasoning. The way to follow the rules is looking who is doing worst and take that as an upper bound?
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> don’t understand the reasoning Prioritising limited enforcement resources based on harm minimisation.
- melenaboija 4y agoAs a citizen of a democratic country I still prefer the laws dictating what is harmful rather than a CEO and a member of the government unilaterally. And if something goes wrong use the tools from a democratic regime to change it. Even with its drawbacks democracies are the best system known to rule countries.
- ArrayBoundCheck 4y agoMore like it's pointless to say you can't do X behavior but someone else can You mostly need to outlaw all of it or someone will keep doing it. Going after smaller companies won't change anything