There is a big difference between rebuttals by an expert for a post and general commentary. This is specifically prevalent in the financial information space.

There is a big difference between rebuttals by an expert for a post and general commentary. This is specifically prevalent in the financial information space. Last week the news broke that the Twitter deal won't close. Naturally, everyone who thinks of themselves as relevant needed to comment on it (myself included) Some people with valuable information others with less valuable information. On Twitter / Stocktwits / Discord / Telegram commentary and rebuttal merge which makes it really hard to follow the threads. On WSJ, Seeking Alpha, etc, the UGC articles are very long and don't encourage a proper discourse. The reason WSB on Reddit was so successful (14M users) was the simple fact that they encourage an online discussion that is weighted by quality.