3 ms·
Suing over an internal code name (not a marketing name?) Quite a stretch...
by gjsman-1000 4y ago
Suing over an internal code name (not a marketing name?) Quite a stretch...
- thayne 4y agoBut then they refused to acknowledge that he had not endorsed their product and had not received compensation after the name was revealed. While probably not illegal, IMO that was still morally wrong.
- duxup 4y ago> and had not received compensation after the name was revealed Not sure anyone is entitled to compensation just because a codename is their name.
- danachow 4y agoHe wanted them to officially state that he didn’t receive compensation - that it wasn’t an official endorsement of any kind, compensated or otherwise.
- Brian_K_White 4y agoHe didn't want compensation.
- IncRnd 4y agoThe name must have been used externally, or Carl Sagan wouldn't have known about it.
- google234123 4y agoIt got leaked?
- IncRnd 4y agoFor Carl Sagan to have learned the internal code name of a computer, it seems likely that the code name was leaked to the outside of Apple. According to the article, this happened in a 1993 issue of MacWeek.
- CharlesW 4y agoFrom TFA: “When these internal codenames were first revealed in a 1993 issue of MacWeek, Sagan was concerned that the use of his name might be misconstrued as an official endorsement.”
- emsign 4y agoFor someone like Carl Sagan his name is his most valuable asset. His reputation was being toyed with without his consent by a much more powerful entitity than him. He used the only defensive that the US is providing to individuals like him, that's the legal system. Apple's reaction confirmed their total disregard for his reputation and thus his source of income. I find it shameful to suggest the weaker opponent the one who has been wronged by a bigger corporation or celebrity should always shut up and leave the more powerful entitity do what they want. I find that disgraceful.
- ycombinete 4y agoUnless there's something missing from the article, Sagan comes out of this looking, to me, like a bit of a BHA
- Shorel 4y agoThen keep it internal. As soon as it was published in an article, it was no longer internal, just a code name.