3 ms·
> That’s different, someone can be aware of fruit but not the alcohol within it. To assume they are interchangeable is it to make assumptions about what’s going
by strogonoff 4y ago
> That’s different, someone can be aware of fruit but not the alcohol within it. To assume they are interchangeable is it to make assumptions about what’s going on.
I don’t follow. Perhaps you’re confusing awareness with consciousness.
> Consciousness is a product of the physical world. That's the theory and explanation.
Ladies and gentlemen, behold the sophistication of physicalist takes. The hard problem, solved right in front of our eyes.
- Retric 4y ago> Perhaps you’re confusing awareness with consciousness. Nope, you are. Being conscious doesn't imply absolute awareness of everything. A conscious entity can do something without total to understand everything in all of existence across all space and time. If I make something without alcohol and by the time you drink it it has alcohol then how am I supposed to know you where going to wait/it’s delayed in the mail or whatever. > The hard problem, solved Why assume it’s a hard problem? If you ask what 1 + 1 is don’t expect a long answer.
- strogonoff 4y ago> Being conscious doesn't imply absolute awareness of everything. Exactly… > If you ask 1 + 1 1 + 1 is operating well-defined terms, this is not.