3 ms·
Then the paper itself is an example of distorted thinking. Given the prevalence of such forms of mass-analysis, I would argue that the paper is at least ironica
by imoverclocked 4y ago
Then the paper itself is an example of distorted thinking. Given the prevalence of such forms of mass-analysis, I would argue that the paper is at least ironically true.
- ccvannorman 4y agoMaybe irony with a dash of truth as well, depending on how many people reactively agree with / are angered by the [ obstensibly incorrect ] paper (thus becoming "distorted" themselves.)