which is strange since its hard to tally this: http://blog.foursquare.com/2010/10/05/so-that-was-a-bummer/ http://blog.foursquare.com/2010/10/05/so-that-was-a-b

which is strange since its hard to tally this: http://blog.foursquare.com/2010/10/05/so-that-was-a-bummer/ http://blog.foursquare.com/2010/10/05/so-that-was-a-bummer/ with what Harry says today about it never being serious and never losing money: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3203223 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3203223 Or maybe he doesn't count the opportunity cost? Or reputation for that matter.