3 ms·
> Meanwhile, I'm not even sure what it means to say that a society has depression. This is a key question. I'll take a punt: It's not that a societal depress
by nonrandomstring 4y ago
> Meanwhile, I'm not even sure what it means to say that a society has
depression.
This is a key question. I'll take a punt: It's not that a societal
depression is the sum total of individuals feeling glum. To say
"society is in depression" is more like economic depression, rather
than "everyone in society is depressed" (though that might be a
consequence).
In a depressed society things stop functioning. Like institutions,
health, education, law...
In an economic depression it's a "chemical imbalance" of money not
circulating.
In a societal depression it's a breakdown of ideas circulating (and
that includes "ideologies" and "emotional ideas" like generosity, and
diversity.
There are many enemies of intellectual life that corrode innovation,
hope, vision and the life-blood a civilisation needs to flourish (as
opposed to soulless technocratic subsistence). The Greeks called that
force Thanatos. I do believe its ascendency is connected to technology
and our inability to master it. Valery Legasov, like myself, was a
stanch opponent of the folly of "technological determinism" and said
that "people must take control of technology, not the other about
about, if civilisation is to survive" [1].
[1] In reaction to the Chernobyl disaster.
- karaterobot 4y agoBut none of that is established in the literature they're drawing from when they say that certain n-grams are associated with cognitive distortions related to depression. When they say 'cognitive distortion', they're very specifically talking about depression in the psychological sense, not the economic sense, or the cultural sense. That's why they'd have to establish that whole societies functioned like individuals — not in a poetic sense, but in a literal sense. Very hard to do that, and nobody has to my knowledge. This is the kind of thing you could say in an opinion piece, but not a research paper.
- nonrandomstring 4y ago> That's why they'd have to establish that whole societies functioned like individuals — not in a poetic sense, but in a literal sense. Very hard to do that, and nobody has to my knowledge. Indeed. I'm (hopefully) clearly extending the interpretation well beyond the scope of that paper, which I took on face value to be unsatisfactory. I'm not quite sure what you mean by "establish" but the analog of "society of mind" (not just Minsky's take) as emergent of faculties at both neurological and human organisational levels is old and appears in many forms throughout philosophy and political theory. "Poetry" would be the highest complement, but alas I am too clumsy with words for that.