> Selling a company (and even anything in life) has to be a win-win situation, a world where there are only scammers / predators around you would be nightmarish

> Selling a company (and even anything in life) has to be a win-win situation, a world where there are only scammers / predators around you would be nightmarish. How isn't this win-win? Musk gets a company for a price he considered acceptable. It's the same company. It's the same price. How was this win-win before when he made the agreement, but not win-win now? > When you force people against their will, wtf business practice. Against their will? He made an agreement to buy it. Does canceling the agreement against Twitter's will somehow not matter at all? > What is the good thing to celebrate about that ? Also when selling companies, employee depend on that. You cannot have an owner who is hostile to your employees. The new owners become hostile because they are not financed enough (because they didn't want the deal), or because the board was hostile and forced the take-over. If Musk really no longer wants Twitter and wants to reach an amicable resolution, he could start by offering $44 billion minus the current market value of Twitter. Twitter might very well accept that or something close to that. Then Musk wouldn't need to own something he doesn't want, but Twitter would still roughly be getting the overall value agreed upon with Musk.