5 ms·
Then it would apply to a lot more situations. The problem is that the only reason people are that close is that they are recording. If they try to say "no one c
by robbrown451 4y ago
Then it would apply to a lot more situations. The problem is that the only reason people are that close is that they are recording. If they try to say "no one can be closer than 8 feet" that complicates things considerably.... I mean, I've walked by such situations on the sidewalk and gotten closer than 8 feet, because it was unavoidable without crossing the street. (these situations weren't ones likely to be filmed, though, just typical city stuff like with homeless and/or mentally ill people) But I wasn't just hanging out really closely, as I'd be if recording.
I think they were just trying to address a relatively new situation that was causing them problems.
I don't really agree with this law, but I also don't think your cynicism on that particular thing is entirely warranted.
- benatkin 4y agoI'd prefer to be recording when I walk past in that situation to make sure they don't mess with ME without being recorded. It's not a hypothetical situation. I've been there. This is my home state Arizona and from time to time I think about moving back and this makes me not want to.
- robbrown451 4y agoGeez I'd just cross the street to avoid the situation rather than go to that kind of effort.
- benatkin 4y agoYeah most of the time I do that but it's not always practical. For one thing what about if there are police on both sides? Yes that happens.