4 ms·

Twitter even admitted to overcounting its users: https://techcrunch.com/2022/04/28/twitter-says-it-overcounted-its-users-over-the-past-3-years-by-as-much-as-1-9

• bagels 4y ago
  By 1%, and they corrected it?
  • yunohn 4y ago
    This whole article and their filings avoid using percentages, specifically because it’s misleading at their size. Absolute numbers make more sense. Regardless, “this is not the first time Twitter reported erroneous metrics around users” is the problem with them.
    • Rexxar 4y ago
      Why you think absolute number make more sense ?
      • yunohn 4y ago
        Well, even by percentage, 1 in 100 users at their scale is massive. More context: https://dataschool.com/misrepresenting-data/relative-vs-absolute-change/ https://dataschool.com/misrepresenting-data/relative-vs-abso...
        • verbify 4y ago
          The article says to use both - not a preference for using absolute numbers at large scales.
          • yunohn 4y ago
            Are you just being pedantic, or do you have a point? I’ve stated my stance.
            • azemetre 4y ago
              Your stance is that 1% is a large amount, people don't understand why you think this is a large amount other than 1% of large numbers happen to be large figures.
        • deleted 4y ago
          [deleted]
• colinmhayes 4y ago
  Doesn’t matter, courts won’t rule that a materially adverse effect