3 ms·

I appreciate this comment and it means a lot to me. Yes, it has been a lot of hard (manual) work. I will always disclose when we reach out to companies and if

I appreciate this comment and it means a lot to me. Yes, it has been a lot of hard (manual) work. I will always disclose when we reach out to companies and if they were/are transparent whilst highlighting when they aren't. I definitely believe this is valuable to consumers. Regarding the badge of approval: Am reaching out to these companies clarify their sourcing now. However, each product on the list though is a brand i've regularly taken for 5-10 years.

potamic 4y ago
My 2 cents, it will good to have an objective way to evaluate such badges. I think the biggest problem with labdoor was that their grading criteria was not transparent.
- richarlidad 4y ago
  You've given me a lot to think about. The overarching goal is to have and maintain a strict objective criteria for these badges of approval. As it stands, the current criteria as outlined in the website is met by 0 companies - the one's you see now are still the best available however as they have in-house production and full control over their supply chain. Eg. Your point stands as Some have CoA's whilst missing label ingredient info.