3 ms·
In terms of urban rail transit SF can’t really be considered #3 SF is #5 in total ridership and significantly worse than that when you look at ridership per mi
by dangus 4y ago
In terms of urban rail transit SF can’t really be considered #3
SF is #5 in total ridership and significantly worse than that when you look at ridership per mile.
I think with a mix of subjective and objective measures I can declare with some confidence that most people would take NYC, Washington DC, Chicago, and Boston over SF’s transit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_rapid_transit_systems_by_ridership https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_rapid_tr...
- kitten_mittens_ 4y agoThe T in Boston is almost cartoonishly short compared to the other 4, but it's definitely a workhorse.