3 ms·
In the specific case of the NYPD the qualifier "now" is not necessary. They have a centuries-long history of acting above and outside the law: https://en.wikipe
by kmeisthax 4y ago
In the specific case of the NYPD the qualifier "now" is not necessary. They have a centuries-long history of acting above and outside the law: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_New_York_City_Police_Department https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_New_York_City_P...
Highlights include:
* Early in it's formation, the historical precursor to the NYPD was two separate police forces; one run by the city and one run by the state. At one point the city police (Municipals) was literally protecting the mayor from arrest by the state police (Metropolitans).
* Having to be rescued by actual nativist[0] gangs after riots broke out after the Metropolitans won out over the Municipals
* Repeated bi-decennial corruption investigations that lead to reforms which just push the corruption somewhere else and make it worse
Fun fact: the NYPD even operates in other countries. There's a weird post-9/11 program called the International Liaison Program[1] in which other countries pay the NYPD to station NYC cops in their country. It's absolutely insane that this somehow doesn't violate some kind of Geneva convention[2].
[0] People who wanted to build a wall and make the Irish pay for it.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVJMtXvjn0A https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVJMtXvjn0A
[2] Look. I'll settle for the "driving on the wrong side of the road" Geneva convention, just give me something
- joshuaissac 4y agoOn the face of it, the last one does not sound so bad, as long as the NYPD is operating with permission from the jurisdictions where they are operating. Just like how a company wholly owned by New York City could have contracts with New York City, London and Paris at the same time.
- justsomehnguy 4y agoExcept cops aren't your Average Joe, they need to obey the local laws regarding a police force operations and without a lot of laws (or a suitable hand-waving) can't do anything more than an American tourist in the destination country.
- aaaaaaaaata 4y agoCan't? Or should not, by law? There's a difference.