4 ms·
> when the penalty is at most $1B This isn't correct. People keep saying this, but it's not true. $1B is the penalty if Musk can't get financing. He has financ
by Hasu 4y ago
> when the penalty is at most $1B
This isn't correct. People keep saying this, but it's not true. $1B is the penalty if Musk can't get financing. He has financing. He has no escape clause now, and this is a transparent and frankly pathetically weak attempt to get out of the deal. If he gets out at all, it will be at a much higher price than $1B.
> It seems kind of obvious to me he’s angling to get a nice discount and close, since he has almost all the leverage
He really doesn't. He signed a binding agreement to purchase Twitter at $54.20/share and none of the excuses he put in this termination notice hold water. The Twitter board has every right and incentive to sue him for specific performance and that's exactly what they're doing. They are in the legal right and have a great chance of winning.
- lettergram 4y agoHis financiers were the ones requesting validation. At this point it appears they pulled financing as the conditions weren’t met.
- foepys 4y agoMusk has enough Tesla shares he can sell. When in doubt he can also sell his share of SpaceX.
- adastra22 4y agoHe would sell Tesla before SpaceX.
- Hasu 4y agoSource? As far as I know his financiers committed on the same terms he did and neither he or they have any right to demand proof about Twitter's user information. You say "it appears" which sounds like speculation.