3 ms·

Is this satire? People just think Windows has majority market share by chance? You can't beat free except in the OS space and not with quality? Users will sh

• headsoup 4y ago
  No, the point is just because something became popular doesn't mean it was because it was a high quality product technically or in UI. The early iPods sucked in usability (controversial!) And functionality, but became popular anyway. I had to support them, they, coupled with iTunes, we're horrible. People just learn to use them and eventually one quirky way of doing things becomes 'the norm.' The 'Linux Desktop' is just as solid as Windows... depending on what you do with it. Just as Windows could be horrible compared to Linux... depending on what you're doing with it
• kaba0 4y ago
  Network effect, relative difficulty of switching an OS and familiarity . It even heavily effects OSX, which has the marketshare it has due to its platform integration, more than anything. It is not a fair competition.
• cycomanic 4y ago
  You said it yourself, free beats everything else. For the vast majority of people the OS is free, they either buy a Mac (OSX already installed) or a Windows PC with Windows already installed. So installing Linux is actually not free (it requires extra work). I would actually not be surprised if the market share of Linux exceeds the market share of Windows where Windows was installed by the user (let's exclude corporate environments because the discussion is much more complicated)