3 ms·
this article is hilarious: 1. go generics do this one thing 2. therefore they are good Go generics are better than no generics but they're still limited, and
by zer0-c00l 4y ago
this article is hilarious:
1. go generics do this one thing
2. therefore they are good
Go generics are better than no generics but they're still limited, and that frustrates me.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- socialdemocrat 4y agoCould you give some concrete examples? Something which requires a type of Go generics but which cannot easily be solved in another way?
- tgv 4y agoThe article really doesn't claim to briefly explore more than precisely that one thing. People just jump on the title plus some weird hate for Go.