5 ms·

> Linux desktop experience does suck Hard disagree. I author multimedia documents, play AAA videogames (on Steam and GOG), watch videos, access my gadgets and

by the_af 4y ago

> Linux desktop experience does suck Hard disagree. I author multimedia documents, play AAA videogames (on Steam and GOG), watch videos, access my gadgets and devices, organize my ebooks collection, print documents on my wireless laser printer, etc. There's not much desktop Linux cannot easily accomplish for me. This "bad Linux desktop" meme needs to die.

ad404b8a372f2b9 4y ago
A desktop is a million little transparent standard functionalities, you can list everything that works and I'll certainly celebrate it with you because it gets better every year and I love it, but hundreds of broken functionalities remain. Every time I install Linux there is something that doesn't work. As recently as last year it took me days to get the Wifi working because of driver problems. I still haven't got Bluetooth to work right on my current workstation. Similarly the USB file transfer UI is broken because the buffer size is too large and it's not been accounted for in the transfer completion calculation. It's a million things and pretty basic and essential ones. And it's impossible to debug, you have to spend 10 hours typing obscure commands because the Linux voodoo-priests have never heard of buttons and GUIs. It used to be that Windows worked for every standard small functionality. And on the rare occasions when you had a problem you would immediately know what part of the control panel or the registry to go to and fix it yourself. Occasionally you had to google and people would give you simple instructions to follow. That was before Microsoft ruined it, but my point is there was a clear difference between Linux and Windows and the best Linux distro did not come close to the level of UX that Windows did. It's not a fair comparison because Linux is so fragmented but to me it remains that the Linux desktop experience is broken in some way for many people who use it.
- the_af 4y ago
  I don't disagree with the gist of your comment, but by that token, I don't remember Windows ever "just working" (especially not for games!), and neither does macOS... (The example I always give is that my wireless HP LaserJet printer works automagically with Ubuntu, but always gives trouble with macOS!) So... all desktops suck?
- redeeman 4y ago
  > but hundreds of broken functionalities remain. And since pretty much forever, even more so on Windows. The difference is that windows users are used to those defects, they pretty much probably didnt realize there was a choice, so that is always the baseline for them. On the whole, if you took a blank computer, gave linux and gave windows, people who had never used a computer before would find themselves more helped with linux than windows. Hell, for nearly a decade it was impossible to install windows on a sata disk(which was by far the standard) without breaking out a floppy drive.
  - sagarm 4y ago
    Oh come on, I had the most basic request of Windows: keep the laptop on while it's connected to a screen and power and I close the screen. It failed. Seriously, how is that not working out of the box in 2022? Even macs get this right. And that's not even getting into the install process and driver downloads, printer configuration, setting up containers, a proper posix shell out of the box, local accounts, and on and on. Windows is basically good for running Steam and has many more OEM supported hardware options. What other advantages does it even have?
  - jayd16 4y ago
    Is this satire? People just think Windows has majority market share by chance? You can't beat free except in the OS space and not with quality? Users will shop around for web browsers and everything else but settle for Windows because... why?
    - headsoup 4y ago
      No, the point is just because something became popular doesn't mean it was because it was a high quality product technically or in UI. The early iPods sucked in usability (controversial!) And functionality, but became popular anyway. I had to support them, they, coupled with iTunes, we're horrible. People just learn to use them and eventually one quirky way of doing things becomes 'the norm.' The 'Linux Desktop' is just as solid as Windows... depending on what you do with it. Just as Windows could be horrible compared to Linux... depending on what you're doing with it
- dTal 4y ago
  >And on the rare occasions when you had a problem you would immediately know what part of the control panel or the registry to go to and fix it yourself. Occasionally you had to google... I don't believe anyone in the history of ever has fixed a problem on their Windows box by confidently wading into the system registry and changing exactly the correct thing. Of all the things to wave around as superior to the Linux way of doing things, the system registry is an odd choice. In fact, I lay a challenge: without googling, type the full path of any single registry key.
  - rrdharan 4y ago
    I can’t pass your challenge but I’ve done it. Memory doesn’t work that way. Open regedit HKLM/CurrentVersion?/MicrosoftWindows/…/<something>/Run and delete whatever dumb Dell startup tray app has set itself up to start automatically. I don’t remember the name of the key but I can navigate to it quickly using arrow keys. Of course this is many years ago before I knew about msconfig…
  - ChrisLomont 4y ago
    >In fact, I lay a challenge: without googling, type the full path of any single registry key. Strawman. You can click registry paths and look around, you can search, and sometimes when something is borked, messages in the logs even tell you what registry key to fiddle with. I've been fiddling with the registry before google was around, so it certainly does not require google or any search. Those only make it easier to share things with others.
- willjp 4y ago
  I agree and disagree. The driver issue is frustrating, but I think this is mostly a choice of hardware issue. If you can get a wifi chip with officially supported drivers it’s pretty painless. Broadcom, in my experience have consistently been the most painful. There are ui configuration options, but the last I tried them (long ago) they felt inconsistent and painful. It quickly became clear that you needed a terminal to solve most issues, and when you didn’t start that way, you’re now faced with both an uncomfortable environment, and a problem to solve. So I opted to get used to the terminal, and I totally fell in love with it. For my (not experienced) level of use, I find that it’s just several different systems. Once you know the name of the system, you can read it’s docs, find it’s configs, etc. I think one of the reasons for the recent popularity of arch is that you are given the choice of, and are made familiar with several of these systems to build your install. Maybe you’re using netctl, dhcpcd, or networkmanager - but you made that choice, and probably the initial configuration. I don’t like the control panel, and the registry is difficult to navigate. Suffering through deeply nested menus to find a setting is a horrible experience for me. I’d much prefer grepping a directory of files for keywords. I have more tools at my disposal. Plus then I can version control and automatically provision a new machine instead of a hunt through ever-changing uis. You’re right that the original configuration takes some extra research and time, but I find for my own setups that the automated setup is worth the investment. This is all very subjective —- I certainly don’t think you’re wrong, but I wanted to share some perspective on how it can be used (in the off chance you weren’t aware) - i hope it might make it more friendly the next time you cross paths :).
  - kaba0 4y ago
    Hell, if you happen to have a supported hardware, linux will give you the best, out-of-the-box experience with it (no “searching for a solution online” and whatever windows doing)
  - CoolCold 4y ago
    > I’d much prefer grepping a directory of files for keywords Do you think it's right way in general? If yes, please join my imaginary experiment case: * you are part of Corporate IT support team * your company is let's say Korean speaking and your OS interface (locale) is Korean as well * you have phone call for support request on for something simple like changing desktop background or changing laptop sleep interval be not 5 minutes but 15 I can imagine in say Windows 11, someone press "win", type "battery" in local language and finds the needed setting, but how someone would "grep" for something in non-native language - I'm not sure. ---- I can imagine more examples, say - what is the way to ask for remote assistance or MDM or disk encryption rollout by CorpIT or wiping data in case of loss or... which would demonstrate to me - it's not ready for broader audience beyond 5% of deviation of population (nerds). And your grepping example, to me, says - such use cases are not even considered when someone says "linux is ready for desktop".
- kaba0 4y ago
  > Every time I install Linux there is something that doesn't work Please show me some software where it is not the case. Like, not being sarcastic, windows has million little cuts all around and my mac is the only modern hardware that managed to reboot on its own. I don’t think Linux is comparably worse, if we are being as unbiased as possible. Sure, in certain compartments windows and osx can be better, but they all suck in others. For example, having multiple screens seems to be an insurmountable problem humanity is not yet ready to solve.
- forgotpwd16 4y ago
  >And it's impossible to debug At least it can be debugged. Good luck doing that on Windows. It isn't by chance that the most common advice is "format and install again." >And on the rare occasions when you had a problem you would immediately know what part of the control panel or the registry to go to and fix it yourself. I vastly prefer running few commands over going through a dozen of interfaces from multiple eras or worse going through the mess that registry is.
unixhero 4y ago
Yeah, Linux desktop experience rocks.
- the_af 4y ago
  I acknowledge it has flaws. Even macOS, the supposed gold standard of good usability and quality, frustrates me to no end at times.
t0bia_s 4y ago
For content creation, Linux is lost. No 10bit support, lack of professional tools like those from Adobe and overall philosophy "from nerds to nerds" is usually time consuming for regular users.
- forgotpwd16 4y ago
  >No 10bit support What does that mean?
  - t0bia_s 4y ago
    Sometimes it is called HDR. 10bit is crucial for colour grading. Photography, cinematography, design...
  - gsich 4y ago
    10 bit per color channel instead of 8.
    - forgotpwd16 4y ago
      Yeah, should've been more specific. I know what 10-bit means, was asking for the "no support" bit.
  - SAI_Peregrinus 4y ago
    Probably 10-bit color. Important for photographers, since modern cameras have 10-bit color sensors. GIMP only supports the sRGB color space with 8-bit color, so it doesn't work properly with wide-gamut monitors.
    - gsich 4y ago
      More like 14-bit, but same issue.
      - t0bia_s 4y ago
        Even 16bit.

by the_af 4y ago

ad404b8a372f2b9 4y ago

A desktop is a million little transparent standard functionalities, you can list everything that works and I'll certainly celebrate it with you because it gets better every year and I love it, but hundreds of broken functionalities remain. Every time I install Linux there is something that doesn't work. As recently as last year it took me days to get the Wifi working because of driver problems. I still haven't got Bluetooth to work right on my current workstation. Similarly the USB file transfer UI is broken because the buffer size is too large and it's not been accounted for in the transfer completion calculation. It's a million things and pretty basic and essential ones. And it's impossible to debug, you have to spend 10 hours typing obscure commands because the Linux voodoo-priests have never heard of buttons and GUIs. It used to be that Windows worked for every standard small functionality. And on the rare occasions when you had a problem you would immediately know what part of the control panel or the registry to go to and fix it yourself. Occasionally you had to google and people would give you simple instructions to follow. That was before Microsoft ruined it, but my point is there was a clear difference between Linux and Windows and the best Linux distro did not come close to the level of UX that Windows did. It's not a fair comparison because Linux is so fragmented but to me it remains that the Linux desktop experience is broken in some way for many people who use it.

the_af 4y ago
I don't disagree with the gist of your comment, but by that token, I don't remember Windows ever "just working" (especially not for games!), and neither does macOS... (The example I always give is that my wireless HP LaserJet printer works automagically with Ubuntu, but always gives trouble with macOS!) So... all desktops suck?
redeeman 4y ago
> but hundreds of broken functionalities remain. And since pretty much forever, even more so on Windows. The difference is that windows users are used to those defects, they pretty much probably didnt realize there was a choice, so that is always the baseline for them. On the whole, if you took a blank computer, gave linux and gave windows, people who had never used a computer before would find themselves more helped with linux than windows. Hell, for nearly a decade it was impossible to install windows on a sata disk(which was by far the standard) without breaking out a floppy drive.
- sagarm 4y ago
  Oh come on, I had the most basic request of Windows: keep the laptop on while it's connected to a screen and power and I close the screen. It failed. Seriously, how is that not working out of the box in 2022? Even macs get this right. And that's not even getting into the install process and driver downloads, printer configuration, setting up containers, a proper posix shell out of the box, local accounts, and on and on. Windows is basically good for running Steam and has many more OEM supported hardware options. What other advantages does it even have?
- jayd16 4y ago
  Is this satire? People just think Windows has majority market share by chance? You can't beat free except in the OS space and not with quality? Users will shop around for web browsers and everything else but settle for Windows because... why?
  - headsoup 4y ago
    No, the point is just because something became popular doesn't mean it was because it was a high quality product technically or in UI. The early iPods sucked in usability (controversial!) And functionality, but became popular anyway. I had to support them, they, coupled with iTunes, we're horrible. People just learn to use them and eventually one quirky way of doing things becomes 'the norm.' The 'Linux Desktop' is just as solid as Windows... depending on what you do with it. Just as Windows could be horrible compared to Linux... depending on what you're doing with it
dTal 4y ago
>And on the rare occasions when you had a problem you would immediately know what part of the control panel or the registry to go to and fix it yourself. Occasionally you had to google... I don't believe anyone in the history of ever has fixed a problem on their Windows box by confidently wading into the system registry and changing exactly the correct thing. Of all the things to wave around as superior to the Linux way of doing things, the system registry is an odd choice. In fact, I lay a challenge: without googling, type the full path of any single registry key.
- rrdharan 4y ago
  I can’t pass your challenge but I’ve done it. Memory doesn’t work that way. Open regedit HKLM/CurrentVersion?/MicrosoftWindows/…/<something>/Run and delete whatever dumb Dell startup tray app has set itself up to start automatically. I don’t remember the name of the key but I can navigate to it quickly using arrow keys. Of course this is many years ago before I knew about msconfig…
- ChrisLomont 4y ago
  >In fact, I lay a challenge: without googling, type the full path of any single registry key. Strawman. You can click registry paths and look around, you can search, and sometimes when something is borked, messages in the logs even tell you what registry key to fiddle with. I've been fiddling with the registry before google was around, so it certainly does not require google or any search. Those only make it easier to share things with others.
willjp 4y ago
I agree and disagree. The driver issue is frustrating, but I think this is mostly a choice of hardware issue. If you can get a wifi chip with officially supported drivers it’s pretty painless. Broadcom, in my experience have consistently been the most painful. There are ui configuration options, but the last I tried them (long ago) they felt inconsistent and painful. It quickly became clear that you needed a terminal to solve most issues, and when you didn’t start that way, you’re now faced with both an uncomfortable environment, and a problem to solve. So I opted to get used to the terminal, and I totally fell in love with it. For my (not experienced) level of use, I find that it’s just several different systems. Once you know the name of the system, you can read it’s docs, find it’s configs, etc. I think one of the reasons for the recent popularity of arch is that you are given the choice of, and are made familiar with several of these systems to build your install. Maybe you’re using netctl, dhcpcd, or networkmanager - but you made that choice, and probably the initial configuration. I don’t like the control panel, and the registry is difficult to navigate. Suffering through deeply nested menus to find a setting is a horrible experience for me. I’d much prefer grepping a directory of files for keywords. I have more tools at my disposal. Plus then I can version control and automatically provision a new machine instead of a hunt through ever-changing uis. You’re right that the original configuration takes some extra research and time, but I find for my own setups that the automated setup is worth the investment. This is all very subjective —- I certainly don’t think you’re wrong, but I wanted to share some perspective on how it can be used (in the off chance you weren’t aware) - i hope it might make it more friendly the next time you cross paths :).
- kaba0 4y ago
  Hell, if you happen to have a supported hardware, linux will give you the best, out-of-the-box experience with it (no “searching for a solution online” and whatever windows doing)
- CoolCold 4y ago
  > I’d much prefer grepping a directory of files for keywords Do you think it's right way in general? If yes, please join my imaginary experiment case: * you are part of Corporate IT support team * your company is let's say Korean speaking and your OS interface (locale) is Korean as well * you have phone call for support request on for something simple like changing desktop background or changing laptop sleep interval be not 5 minutes but 15 I can imagine in say Windows 11, someone press "win", type "battery" in local language and finds the needed setting, but how someone would "grep" for something in non-native language - I'm not sure. ---- I can imagine more examples, say - what is the way to ask for remote assistance or MDM or disk encryption rollout by CorpIT or wiping data in case of loss or... which would demonstrate to me - it's not ready for broader audience beyond 5% of deviation of population (nerds). And your grepping example, to me, says - such use cases are not even considered when someone says "linux is ready for desktop".
kaba0 4y ago
> Every time I install Linux there is something that doesn't work Please show me some software where it is not the case. Like, not being sarcastic, windows has million little cuts all around and my mac is the only modern hardware that managed to reboot on its own. I don’t think Linux is comparably worse, if we are being as unbiased as possible. Sure, in certain compartments windows and osx can be better, but they all suck in others. For example, having multiple screens seems to be an insurmountable problem humanity is not yet ready to solve.
forgotpwd16 4y ago
>And it's impossible to debug At least it can be debugged. Good luck doing that on Windows. It isn't by chance that the most common advice is "format and install again." >And on the rare occasions when you had a problem you would immediately know what part of the control panel or the registry to go to and fix it yourself. I vastly prefer running few commands over going through a dozen of interfaces from multiple eras or worse going through the mess that registry is.

unixhero 4y ago

Yeah, Linux desktop experience rocks.

the_af 4y ago
I acknowledge it has flaws. Even macOS, the supposed gold standard of good usability and quality, frustrates me to no end at times.

t0bia_s 4y ago

For content creation, Linux is lost. No 10bit support, lack of professional tools like those from Adobe and overall philosophy "from nerds to nerds" is usually time consuming for regular users.

forgotpwd16 4y ago
>No 10bit support What does that mean?
- t0bia_s 4y ago
  Sometimes it is called HDR. 10bit is crucial for colour grading. Photography, cinematography, design...
- gsich 4y ago
  10 bit per color channel instead of 8.
  - forgotpwd16 4y ago
    Yeah, should've been more specific. I know what 10-bit means, was asking for the "no support" bit.
- SAI_Peregrinus 4y ago
  Probably 10-bit color. Important for photographers, since modern cameras have 10-bit color sensors. GIMP only supports the sRGB color space with 8-bit color, so it doesn't work properly with wide-gamut monitors.
  - gsich 4y ago
    More like 14-bit, but same issue.
    - t0bia_s 4y ago
      Even 16bit.