I went to the article looking for some statistic or a factual observation. I had thought to myself "oh it's Forbes, it must be something reputable." I was, um,

I went to the article looking for some statistic or a factual observation. I had thought to myself "oh it's Forbes, it must be something reputable." I was, um, mistaken. Take the below snippet, seemingly the only piece of information the article is pinned against. "The 1,000 people surveyed are supposed to be avid fans and industry professionals, but they should all have their consoles and computers taken away after giving answers like these." So it seems his entire article is based on the pretence that the combined thought of these 1,000 people is incorrect.. because he says so. I don't think cantankerously written, for-hits-only articles belong on "reputable" sites.