While "Change gives the illusion of progress"[1] and there's a lot of overcomplicated "enterprise architecture" BS floating around, peddled by consultants looki

While "Change gives the illusion of progress"[1] and there's a lot of overcomplicated "enterprise architecture" BS floating around, peddled by consultants looking to make big bucks off locking an organization into their schemes - isn't some organizational strategy needed for organizing large distributed computational systems? (I don't want to use the word "clouds") If so, then it's worth taking a look at the proposal and assessing it based on its own merits. I, personally, would rather swallow my pride and admit that a particular architecture, while coached in buzzwords, is actually a good idea and will prevent me from pulling my hair out, then eschew all outside advice and have my workdays be filled with stress. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31986784 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31986784