>Again, still avoiding the point, but oddly enough proving the point. Please read, that was my comment: >>Not true the point was you pay for it (cloud), or yo

>Again, still avoiding the point, but oddly enough proving the point. Please read, that was my comment: >>Not true the point was you pay for it (cloud), or you do it yourself >You assume everyone isn't an amateur and knows how to build and maintain server hardware. Yes that i assume, correct. Otherwise i would not call it "maintaining", is a amateur maintaining your car? Your software? If you have just amateur's handling your hardware it's probably better to pay a cloud-provider or pay a integrator todo that.