2 ms·
This is the nutgraph: “ The Commission has information that AOM and its members may be imposing licensing terms (mandatory royalty-free cross licensing) on inn
by IfOnlyYouKnew 4y ago
This is the nutgraph:
“ The Commission has information that AOM and its members may be imposing licensing terms (mandatory royalty-free cross licensing) on innovators that were not a part of AOM at the time of the creation of the AV1 technical, but whose patents are deemed essential to (its) technical specifications," the paper said.
This concern is certainly valid, i. e. it is logically consistent. I would tend to agree with the sentiment that standardization is net-positive, but I know next to nothing about the commercial aspects happening behind the scenes of these processes.
- heisenbit 4y agoSounds like there are AV1 patents that are not free and are not interested in a cross licensing. Anyone knows what patents or parties are this? In principle such a thing is problematic when the heavyweights get together and de-facto force others to sell at a low price. It is seen unfair as the big one finance this squeeze with profits from other markets where they but not the niche player gain.