First, lets talk in the foggy dreamland of this article. I can't imagine the threats security researchers deal with every day. And their innovative solutions.

First, lets talk in the foggy dreamland of this article. I can't imagine the threats security researchers deal with every day. And their innovative solutions. Extracting live code from samples to inject in other malware. Wow, so cutting-edge. It's wonderful to talk about, no stress there, no drama. We don't want wear and tear on our machines. Like the article states, we're spending millions and billions on these problems. And lockdowns are an innovative approach. I've been thankful for device lockout in the field before. It's saved my bacon. Captures the favorite philosophy of strong regulatory control. Nice, has network effects for other political goals. Very cool. Better than Kevorkianing or Bricking a machine in the field. Oh God, Oh God, Oh God. Sorry for that narrative-scape shattering. Dementia is a serious issue. Ok, back to sanity. Some really fucking smart people showed me a study on evolutionary computation and diversity in investigator-guided processes. Hand-edited synthetic organisms may be less evolutionary successful than purely evolved ones. Like my storytelling, right? It's a fucking hot mess that isn't excersing my audiences mind as much as a more diverse author population. Oh God, there I am breaking down story-wise. Back to stability. We have political goals like reduction of 99% of security threats. And the perfect is the enemy of the good, right? I'm so sorry for my slips there, I know you lost time with loved ones and reading other comments talking about this in a more professional tone that captures the point. In closing, I'd like to thank the sponsors who kept me fed for years.