Yea so I thibk that's a readonable argument. And I recognize this is a news article, and not like... constitutional law discussion. But I think the real origin

Yea so I thibk that's a readonable argument. And I recognize this is a news article, and not like... constitutional law discussion. But I think the real origin of this article is: the author is upset about FOSTA, a view I happen to share. But it's out of the news cycle. So he draws a tenuous connection to a current event, making it both relevant again, and stirring some telelogical history. But the recent decisions are not really based on FOSTA, and as far as I can tell there was no legal precedent set by these acts that had anything to do with the recent decisions.