> Even discounting that, politics had nothing to do with system's adoption. They had a lot to do with systemd's adoption! As I said in a reply to a sibling co

> Even discounting that, politics had nothing to do with system's adoption. They had a lot to do with systemd's adoption! As I said in a reply to a sibling comment, usual adoption means getting users to adopt your software. Poettering used politics to get distros to adopt his software. Completely different methods. > Rather systemd was adopted because it was technically superior to any contemporary alternative. Not really. For certain use cases, yes, but systemd is still laughably bad.