>The language: Tech companies are becoming more aware of the dangers posed by maintaining and updating large codebases written in an untyped language. This (in

>The language: Tech companies are becoming more aware of the dangers posed by maintaining and updating large codebases written in an untyped language. This (insinuation that dynamic typing is inherently worse to maintain) actually isn't true. There's no evidence proving this. Its one of those things that slowly became common sense and goes unquestioned. There was a Github repo with scientific publications demonstrating the above. I think it made it to HN a while ago. Wish I could find it now.