I hold all power sources to the same standard. As long nuclear don't put their pollution into the air, storing it is almost infinitive better. Any energy source

I hold all power sources to the same standard. As long nuclear don't put their pollution into the air, storing it is almost infinitive better. Any energy source that just release pollution into the environment as a cost-saving strategy should be banned, which by economical standard makes all fossil fuel energy sources (and possible some bio fuel ones) nonviable. The same is for handling worst case scenarios, and here we got a prime example for which to base a minimum standard. Hydropower dams has very bad worst case scenarios if they burst. For the person who dies, neither radiation poisoning or drowning is pretty pleasant, so which ever regulation and liability we want to apply to both is fine by me. One option to is to ban any energy source the release pollution, and any energy source that has a risk to human lives. The candle industry would be happy, through I suspect there would be an increase in house fires.