3 ms·
That doesn't make any sense because Russian companies are significant suppliers within the nuclear power production logistics footprint. edit: eg. https://www.
by dv_dt 4y ago
That doesn't make any sense because Russian companies are significant suppliers within the nuclear power production logistics footprint.
edit: eg. https://www.wired.com/story/the-nuclear-reactors-of-the-future-have-a-russia-problem/ https://www.wired.com/story/the-nuclear-reactors-of-the-futu...
- sp0ck 4y agoMoney Russia gets from nuclear poewr production are miniscule comparing to money from gas/oil export. _any_ expansion of nuclear energy in Europe is against Russian agenda to be major gas/oil provider. Geramany suppose to be broker of that. For Germany cheap Nuclear energy on central/east Europe is dangerous because cheap energy = more competitive market. Add cheaper workforce and you have very dangerous mix. Read why Bulgaria was forced to shut down majority of their reactors before joining EU. Offically it was about "security". Bulgaria with cheap nuclear energy from already built power plants and cheap workforce was too "dangerous" for old EU countries. Politics is very important when discussing energy market.
- dimitar 4y agoExactly! Plus the majority of customers for Russias nuclear tech are not in the West - they are in places like Iran, Turkey, China and some smaller countries.