4 ms·
I know it's a system that hangs together and (locally) makes sense, but I'm still cynical about the mental gymnastics necessary to "properly" explain a system t
by goatcode 4y ago
I know it's a system that hangs together and (locally) makes sense, but I'm still cynical about the mental gymnastics necessary to "properly" explain a system that started with dishonest gold vault operators, pretending they had more than they did. That perspective still applies to modern banks, but what can you do.
- lxgr 4y agoThe only thing that matters from the depositor's point of view is the probability of being able to redeem a deposit in various scenarios. The reserve ratio is only one component to that. As an extreme example, what would you prefer: An FDIC-insured account in your name, or handing cash to a guy you found on craigslist who's promising to safely bury it for you in the forest?
- goatcode 4y agoIndeed, we have been given convenience and a promise of security, but the way in which we operate is not sustainable for the vast majority of people, over a long enough timeline, imo. As to what I'd prefer (my not having the slightest clue as to how to operate within it notwithstanding): barter and trade. Yes, I know that a lot of the things we enjoy now wouldn't be easy under such a setup, but as with all things that make life easier, there's always a cost in the end. Bargaining with the devil always seems like a great idea until you read the whole story.