2 ms·
Thing is, the plans and decisions have already been made, under a more stringent definition. By changing the definition, they have effectively undermined those
by denton-scratch 4y ago
Thing is, the plans and decisions have already been made, under a more stringent definition. By changing the definition, they have effectively undermined those earlier plans and decisions. That's dishonesty.
- frafra 4y agoThere were no plans and decisions on the taxonomy regarding gas or nuclear before, which is part of the Commission action plan on financing sustainable growth. The taxonomy still needs a final vote to pass, actually, and it does not replace any previous taxonomy or regulation. Check your sources before moving accusations.
- denton-scratch 4y agoThe previous "taxonomy" was the default understanding, that "green" doesn't include burning methane.