3 ms·
The decompiler they used to view that code is not very good, that output is garbled. If you're going to take apart JVM bytecode, you're better off using Recafe
by gavinray 4y ago
The decompiler they used to view that code is not very good, that output is garbled.
If you're going to take apart JVM bytecode, you're better off using Recafe or Quiltflower.
https://github.com/Col-E/Recaf https://github.com/Col-E/Recaf
https://github.com/QuiltMC/quiltflower https://github.com/QuiltMC/quiltflower
- GranPC 4y agoThe reason the output is "garbled" is because it was obfuscated with ProGuard - there's no real way around that except for manually renaming variables and classes. Any idea whether any of these two decompilers work with Dalvik bytecode?
- AtNightWeCode 4y agoYou could always use dex2jar first. https://github.com/pxb1988/dex2jar https://github.com/pxb1988/dex2jar