3 ms·
Absolutely with you here. One of my biggest theories for UAP where there’s no human eyeball, or independent visible spectrum photographic equivalents… is good o
by techdragon 4y ago
Absolutely with you here. One of my biggest theories for UAP where there’s no human eyeball, or independent visible spectrum photographic equivalents… is good old fashioned “glitch”. In the era of intercordinated multi spectrum AWACS systems I don’t see it as impossible that an errant target in one system could trigger automatic focus/gain controls in other systems even on other vessels or vehicles that could make it look like they too see “something”
It’s not a good explanation for all the weird UAP stories but when I hear about a carrier and patrol aircraft sharing a weird radar signal they all track together as it moves impossibly fast… well I start to question the system that connects them all into an integrated system.
But that’s just outside speculation based on what they described, with the sorts of things they describe it would be really damn nice to see even redacted video or reconstructed sensor displays or something, it’s maddening trying to talk rationally about what is clearly some thing or things that is going on when we’re discussing second or third hand sources and trying to pick apart legit stuff from people making up things for reasons ranging from profit to mental health issues.