4 ms·
Search and read on founder vesting and founder cap tables in places like Quora, Venturehacks and Ask The VC. Yes, having a part-time or passive shareholder wit
by jkaljundi 15y ago
Search and read on founder vesting and founder cap tables in places like Quora, Venturehacks and Ask The VC.
Yes, having a part-time or passive shareholder with 33% ownership can be a major no-no for raising external financing. Both 50/50% and 33/33/33% are often considered bad even with full-time co-founders.
One thing you definitely should do is to honestly discuss this with your passive co-founder. Ask him, how low would he be willing to go if the 2 choices are not raising any financing and having his 33% or going down to 15/10/5/3/1% and having a smaller piece of a larger pie.
Even if you do not have founder vesting in place (which you should discuss anyway) you can come to a gentlemen´s agreement. Over the coming 3-4 years if things go well for you 2 full-time guys, you will be putting much more effort into the company anyway, so you should get more. Either rethink the original agreement or award you 2 significant additional options.
Related:
http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2011/05/09/the-co-founder-mythology/ http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2011/05/09/the-co-founder...
- throwaway12464 15y agoI guess I'm not sure I understand the problem. Why would investors be turned off? It's one thing if the partner is not pulling their weight, but its another if they are. From the investor perspective, assuming that some founders are more valuable than others, wouldn't the passive founder be disproportionately diluted out on future rounds through vesting or options?