9 ms·
Russia's invasion of Ukraine was the unilateral issue here, everything else was a response to that. But either way I'd characterise this as a 'payment dispute'
by bigDinosaur 4y ago
Russia's invasion of Ukraine was the unilateral issue here, everything else was a response to that. But either way I'd characterise this as a 'payment dispute' because the issue was how Russia wanted to be paid, not that Finland was barred from paying them at all.
- mperdemata 4y agoThere is nothing unilateral in two imperialist powers fighting. Just like there was nothing unilateral in WW1 or WW2.
- PoignardAzur 4y agoSure, the start of World War 2 was very multilateral: Poland wanted not to get invaded, Nazi Germany and the USSR both disagreed. The parallels with the current situation are left up to the reader.
- mperdemata 4y agoWhat about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_Agreement https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_Agreement Do you really think that WW2 happened over whether Poland would be invaded? I think you are confusing cause and effect. Same as thinking that WWI happened due to the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand.