4 ms·
I think it's worth noting that the people did not sign off, only the keys did. The system does not require people to sign off, but for the keys to sign off. I
by 8note 4y ago
I think it's worth noting that the people did not sign off, only the keys did.
The system does not require people to sign off, but for the keys to sign off.
I don't think it's worth calling this a hack, the keys are what owned the moneies, and it's the keys that decided what to do with it. People have access to keys, they don't own them
- brokensegue 4y agoThis is a preposterous position. It's clearly a hack. Keys cannot legally own anything. People and organizations own things and in this case the people were hacked and the funds stolen.
- LASR 4y agoOk. So by your logic, my house keys owns my house? But don’t I own my house keys too?
- rmbyrro 4y agoYour keychain owns your house keys. It should be paying your mortgage, by the way.
- birdyrooster 4y ago