3 ms·

> Yeah, and a well regulated militia is also a thing, but that bit seems to be brushed off. It's not brushed off. It is obsessed over by progressives, though.

> Yeah, and a well regulated militia is also a thing, but that bit seems to be brushed off. It's not brushed off. It is obsessed over by progressives, though. Shall not be infringed is incredibly strong language. Does it need to be in bold for you to understand? Frame the tool argument however you like. At the end of the day gun control isn't even _possible_ in America. A revolution would break out at some point. Is that something that you think is "worth it" to ban scary guns?

manuelabeledo 4y ago
> It's not brushed off. It is obsessed over by progressives, though. Shall not be infringed is incredibly strong language. Does it need to be in bold for you to understand? So "shall not be infringed" is strong language, but "well regulated militia" is not. > At the end of the day gun control isn't even _possible_ in America. Let me be frank: this is because a very vocal minority doesn't want to give up their toys. You cannot convince me that people with 10+ guns are out there because they want to take up arms against a tyrannic government. They like their guns the same way they could like cars, or Lego. > A revolution would break out at some point. Is that something that you think is "worth it" to ban scary guns? There is no way a majority of gun owners would go to war over this, I guarantee you that, and of those who say they would, I bet that the majority are just LARPers with too much free time.