I much prefer: "All models are wrong but some models are useful". For example - Flat earth is a model that is both wrong and useless. My claim is that the tro

I much prefer: "All models are wrong but some models are useful". For example - Flat earth is a model that is both wrong and useless. My claim is that the trolley problem is useless. It asks people to make a guess about how they would behave, but that guess is predicated on a set of initial conditions that are impossible to fulfill (omniscience is a bitch to get in real life). How does gathering all that incorrect data help you? What ethical reasoning are you trying to tease out here? Here's one you might love - "if the earth is flat and you reach the edge, would you jump?" Now lets just categorize everyones answer to the that question.... and: Hold the phone! The earth isn't flat? It doesn't matter? It turns out this question has basically no relevance to anything! Is it fun? Sure. Is it useful? I have doubts.