4 ms·
I think the comment is pointing out that if your child is kidnapped and raised elsewhere, there will not be a reason to fingerprint them then for comparison unl
by GavinMcG 4y ago
I think the comment is pointing out that if your child is kidnapped and raised elsewhere, there will not be a reason to fingerprint them then for comparison unless there's already a reason to think they may have been kidnapped.
That is, it might help on the back end, but the comment is suggesting that mass fingerprinting is not likely to move the needle much.
- rbanffy 4y agoA small chance is better than no chance. I was answering to the privacy concern, not the effectiveness of the method. It seems like a plausible business model to professionally collect hold biometric data encrypted with the owner's keys, opaque to the party storing the data. It's a bit like the businesses that store umbilical cord stem cells for the very unlikely chance they'll be useful at some point in the future.